
IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 24.4 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Re: Christopher J. Singer
Order
WHEREAS on June 23, 2016, the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (the “MFDA”) issued a Notice of Settlement Hearing pursuant to section 24.4 of By-law No. 1 in respect of Christopher J. Singer (the “Respondent”);
AND WHEREAS the Respondent entered into a settlement agreement with Staff of the MFDA, dated February 14, 2017 (the “Settlement Agreement”), in which the Respondent agreed to a proposed settlement of matters for which the Respondent could be disciplined pursuant to ss. 20 and 24.1 of By-law No. 1;
AND WHEREAS the Hearing Panel is of the opinion that,
- between June 2011 and March 17, 2014, the Respondent failed to use due diligence to learn the essential facts relative to client AO and accurately record the essential facts on the client’s New Account Application Forms, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.2.1(a) and 2.1.1;
- between June 2011 and March 17, 2014, the Respondent failed to ensure that an investment recommendation he made to client AO was suitable having regard to the client’s Know-Your-Client (“KYC”) factors including her investment objectives, investment knowledge, risk tolerance, time horizon, and failed to ensure appropriate diversification of her investment portfolio, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.2.1 and 2.1.1;
- between June 2011 and March 17, 2014, the Respondent failed to adequately explain the risks, benefits, material assumptions and features of exempt securities he recommended to client AO, thereby failing to present the investment to the client in a fair and balanced manner, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.2.1 and 2.1.1; and
- between November 17, 2011 and March 17, 2014, the Respondent failed to review or reconsider his recommendation to client AO in light of criteria for assessing the suitability of the ROI Funds provided by the Member in December 2011, contrary to MFDA Rules 2.2.1 and 2.1.1.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Settlement Agreement is accepted, as a consequence of which:
- the Respondent shall pay a fine in the amount of $63,500, pursuant to section 24.1.1(b) of By-law No. 1;
- the Respondent shall pay costs in the amount of $10,000, pursuant to section 24.2 of By-law No. 1;
- if at any time a non-party to this proceeding, with the exception of the bodies set out in section 23 of MFDA By-law No. 1, requests production of or access to exhibits in this proceeding that contain personal information as defined by the MFDA Privacy Policy, then the MFDA Corporate Secretary shall not provide copies of or access to the requested exhibits to the non-party without first redacting from them any and all personal information, pursuant to Rules 1.8(2) and (5) of the MFDA Rules of Procedure.
-
Ian PitfieldIan PitfieldChair
-
Darlene BarkerDarlene BarkerIndustry Representative
-
Holly MillarHolly MillarIndustry Representative
526787 v1