News Release

For immediate release
View and Download English PDF

For further information, please contact:

Charles Toth

Vice President, Enforcement

(416) 943-4619

ctoth@mfda.ca

Mark Stott

Vice-President, Prairie Region

(403) 215-8329

mstott@mfda.ca

MFDA Hearing Panel issues Reasons for Decision in the matter of Pragya Kakkar

December 11, 2017 (Toronto, Ontario) – A Hearing Panel of the Prairie Regional Council of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (“MFDA”) has issued its Reasons for Decision in connection with a settlement hearing held in Edmonton, Alberta on November 17, 2017 in the matter of Pragya Kakkar (“Respondent”).

In its Reasons for Decision dated December 8, 2017, the Hearing Panel confirmed the sanctions imposed on the Respondent. In particular, the Respondent:

  • shall pay a fine in the amount of $7,500 (“Fine”);
  • has paid costs in the amount of $2,500 (“Costs”);
  • the payment of the Fine and Costs shall be made to and received by MFDA Staff in certified funds as follows:
    1. $2,500 (Fine) upon acceptance of the settlement agreement;
    2. $2,500 (Costs) upon acceptance of the settlement agreement;
    3. $2,500 on or before the last business day of the 3rd month following the date of the acceptance of the settlement agreement;
    4. $2,500 on or before the last business day of the 6th month following the date of the acceptance of the settlement agreement;
  • if the Respondent fails to make any of the installment payments described above:
    1. any outstanding balance of the Fine owed shall become immediately due and payable to the MFDA; and
    2. she shall be prohibited from conducting securities related business while in the employ of or associated with a Member of the MFDA until such time as the total amount outstanding of the Fine owed is paid to the MFDA; and
  • shall in the future comply with MFDA Rule 2.1.1.

In the Settlement Agreement dated October 19, 2017, the Respondent admitted that between February 2016 and July 2016, she obtained, possessed, and used to process transactions, 14 pre-signed account forms in respect of six (6) clients, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1.

Copies of the Reasons for Decision and Settlement Agreement are available on the MFDA website at www.mfda.ca. During the period described in the Reasons for Decision, the Respondent carried on business in Edmonton, Alberta.

The MFDA is the self-regulatory organization for Canadian mutual fund dealers, regulating the operations, standards of practice and business conduct of its Members and their approximately 83,000 Approved Persons with a mandate to protect investors and the public interest. For more information about the MFDA’s complaint and enforcement processes, as well as links to ‘Check an Advisor’ and other Investor Tools, visit the For Investors page on the MFDA website.