Skip to Main Content

IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 24.4 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

Re: Chi Hong Arthur Yip

Heard: March 29, 2018 in Toronto, Ontario
Reasons For Decision: July 20, 2018

Reasons For Decision

Hearing Panel of the Central Regional Council:

  • Paul M. Moore, Q.C., Chair
  • Kenneth P. Mann, Industry Representative

Appearances:

Sarah Glickman, Counsel for the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada
A. Benson Forrest, Counsel for the Respondent
Chi Hong Arthur Yip, Respondent, in person

Background

  1. The Hearing Panel accepted the settlement agreement dated October 13, 2017 (“Settlement Agreement”) between the staff of the MFDA and Chi Hong Arthur Yip (“Respondent”). A copy of the Settlement Agreement is attached to these Reasons as Appendix “A”. The agreed facts are set out in Section III of the Settlement Agreement.

Contraventions

  1. The Respondent admitted that:
    1. between April 2015 and September 2015, he signed 10 client signatures on 13 account forms, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1; and
    2. between April 2012 and September 2015, he obtained, possessed and, in some cases used to process transactions, 4 pre-signed account forms, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1.

Agreed penalties

  1. The agreed penalties were: (payable in instalments) i) a fine of $12,500; and ii) a costs award of $2,500.

Considerations

  1. The Hearing Panel determined that it had to be satisfied regarding three considerations before it could accept the Settlement Agreement. First, the agreed penalty had to be within an acceptable range taking into account similar cases. Secondly, the agreed penalty had to be fair and reasonable (i.e. proportional to the seriousness of the contravention and taking into consideration other relevant circumstances) and should appear to be so to members of the public and industry. Thirdly, the agreed penalty should serve as a deterrent to the Respondent and to industry. To be satisfied on these three considerations required an understanding of the particular facts of the case, the circumstances of the Respondent, and the impact on the Respondent of the agreed penalty.

Nature of the Misconduct

  1. Signing a client’s signature on account forms, and obtaining, possessing and using pre-signed account forms are conduct contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1.

Other considerations in determining acceptability of agreed penalties

  1. The was no evidence that the Respondent received any financial benefit from engaging in the misconduct beyond the commissions or fees the Respondent would ordinarily be entitled to receive had the transactions been carried out in the proper manner.
  1. There was no evidence of client loss or lack of client authorization.
  1. The Respondent has not previously been subject to MFDA disciplinary proceedings.
  1. The Member issued a Warning Letter to the Respondent in respect of the pre-signed account forms.
  1. By entering into the Settlement Agreement, the Respondent has accepted responsibility for the misconduct and avoided the necessity of the MFDA incurring the time and expense of conducting a full disciplinary hearing.
  1. The agreed penalties are within the recommendations of the MFDA penalty guidelines and the reasonable range of appropriateness with regard to MFDA decisions submitted to us by staff, made by MFDA Hearing Panels in similar circumstances. They are fair and reasonable and will serve as a specific and general deterrent.

Costs

  1. The costs award is reasonable.

Conclusion

  1. We concluded that the Settlement Agreement was in the public interest and, consequently, we accepted it.
  • Paul M. Moore, Q.C.
    Paul M. Moore, Q.C.
    Chair
  • Kenneth P. Mann
    Kenneth P. Mann
    Industry Representative

625716


Appendix “A”

Settlement Agreement
File No. 2017106

IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING
PURSUANT TO SECTION 24.4 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF
THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

Re: Chi Hong Arthur Yip

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

  1. Staff of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (“Staff”) and the Respondent, Chi Hong Arthur Yip (the “Respondent”), consent and agree to settlement of this matter by way of this agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”).
  2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities which disclosed activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No.1.

II. JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION

  1. Staff and the Respondent jointly recommend that the Hearing Panel accept the Settlement Agreement.
  2. The Respondent admits to the following violations of the By-laws, Rules or Policies of the MFDA:
    1. between April 2012 and September 2015, the Respondent signed the signature of 10 clients on 13 account forms, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1; and
    2. between April 2012 and September 2015, the Respondent obtained, possessed and, in some instances, used to process transactions, 4 pre-signed account forms, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1.
  3. Staff and the Respondent agree and consent to the following terms of settlement:
    1. the Respondent shall pay a fine in the amount of $12,500 pursuant to s. 24.1.1(b) of MFDA By-law No.1 (the “Fine”);
    2. the Respondent shall pay costs in the amount of $2,500 pursuant to s. 24.2 of MFDA By-law No.1 (“Costs”);
    3. the Respondent shall pay the Fine and Costs in certified funds as follows:
      1. $2,500 (Costs) payable upon entering into the Settlement Agreement;
      2. $2083.33 on the last business day of the first month following the date of the settlement hearing;
      3. $2083.33 on the last business day of the second month following the date of the settlement hearing;
      4. $2083.33 on the last business day of the third month following the date of the settlement hearing;
      5. $2083.33 on the last business day of the fourth month following the date of the settlement hearing;
      6. $2083.33 on the last business day of the fifth month following the date of the settlement hearing; and
      7. $2083.33 on the last business day of the sixth month following the date of the settlement hearing;
    4. if the Respondent fails to make any of the payments described above in paragraph 5, any outstanding balance of the Fine and Costs shall become immediately due and payable to the MFDA and the Respondent shall be immediately suspended from conducting securities related business while in the employ of or associated with a Member of the MFDA until such time as the total amount outstanding of Fine and Costs owed by the Respondent is paid to the MFDA, pursuant to s. 24.3.13(c) of MFDA By-law No.1;
    5. the Respondent shall in the future comply with MFDA Rule 2.1.1; and
    6. the Respondent will attend in person, on the date set for the Settlement Hearing.
  4. Staff and the Respondent agree to the settlement on the basis of the facts set out in Part III herein and consent to the making of an Order in the form attached as Schedule “A”.

III. AGREED FACTS

Registration History

  1. Since 1994, the Respondent has been registered as a mutual fund salesperson (now known as a Dealing Representative).
  2. Since 2011, the Respondent has been registered in Ontario with Investia Financial Services Inc. (“Investia”), a Member of the MFDA.
  3. At all material times, the Respondent conducted business in the Markham, Ontario area.

AP Signed Client Signatures

  1. Between April 2012 and September 2015, the Respondent signed the signature of 10 clients on 13 pre-signed account forms (the “Account Forms”).
  2. The Respondent had the clients sign the Account Forms when the forms were either blank or partially incomplete.
  3. The Respondent then completed the missing information on the Account Forms, signed the clients’ names in pen over photocopies of the existing client signatures, and submitted to Investia the Account Forms for processing.
  4. The Account Forms included withdrawal forms, Letters of Direction, and transfer authorization forms.

Pre-Signed Account Forms

  1. At all material times, Investia’s policies and procedures prohibited its Approved Persons, including the Respondent, from using pre-signed account forms.
  2. Between April 2012 and September 2015, the Respondent obtained, possessed and, in some instances, used to process transactions, 4 pre-signed account forms.
  3. The pre-signed account forms consisted of transfer authorization forms and withdrawal forms.

Investia’s Investigation

  1. On January 27, 2016, Investia became aware of the conduct that is the subject of this Settlement Agreement during the course of a branch audit.
  2. As part of its investigation, Investia sent letters to all clients serviced by the Respondent in order to determine whether the Respondent engaged in discretionary trading. No clients reported any concerns. Investia also placed the Respondent under close supervision.
  3. On July 7, 2016, Investia issued a warning letter to the Respondent in respect of the pre-signed account forms.

Additional Factors

  1. There is no evidence that the Respondent received any benefit from the conduct set out above beyond the commissions or fees he would ordinarily be entitled to receive had the transactions been carried out in the proper manner.
  2. There is no evidence of client loss or lack of authorization.
  3. The Respondent has not previously been the subject of MFDA disciplinary proceedings.
  4. By entering into this Settlement Agreement, the Respondent has saved the MFDA the time, resources, and expenses associated with conducting a full hearing on the allegations.

IV. ADDITIONAL TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

  1. This settlement is agreed upon in accordance with section 24.4 of MFDA By-law No. 1 and Rules 14 and 15 of the MFDA Rules of Procedure.
  2. The Settlement Agreement is subject to acceptance by the Hearing Panel which shall be sought at a hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”). At, or following the conclusion of, the Settlement Hearing, the Hearing Panel may either accept or reject the Settlement Agreement. MFDA Settlement Hearings are typically held in the absence of the public pursuant to section 20.5 of MFDA By-law No. 1 and Rule 15.2(2) of the MFDA Rules of Procedure. If the Hearing Panel accepts the Settlement Agreement, then the proceeding will become open to the public and a copy of the decision of the Hearing Panel and the Settlement Agreement will be made available at mfda.ca.
  3. The Settlement Agreement shall become effective and binding upon the Respondent and Staff as of the date of its acceptance by the Hearing Panel. Unless otherwise stated, any monetary penalties and costs imposed upon the Respondent are payable immediately, and any suspensions, revocations, prohibitions, conditions or other terms of the Settlement Agreement shall commence, upon the effective date of the Settlement Agreement.
  4. Staff and the Respondent agree that if this Settlement Agreement is accepted by the Hearing Panel:
    1. the Settlement Agreement will constitute the entirety of the evidence to be submitted respecting the Respondent in this matter;
    2. the Respondent waives any rights to a full hearing, a review hearing before the Board of Directors of the MFDA or any securities commission with jurisdiction in the matter under its enabling legislation, or a judicial review or appeal of the matter before any court of competent jurisdiction;
    3. Staff will not initiate any proceeding under the By-laws of the MFDA against the Respondent in respect of the contraventions described in this Settlement Agreement. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement precludes Staff from investigating or initiating proceedings in respect of any contraventions that are not set out in this Settlement Agreement.  Furthermore, nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall relieve the Respondent from fulfilling any continuing regulatory obligations;
    4. the Respondent shall be deemed to have been penalized by the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1.2 of By-law No. 1 for the purpose of giving notice to the public thereof in accordance with s. 24.5 of By-law No. 1; and
    5. neither Staff nor the Respondent will make any public statement inconsistent with this Settlement Agreement. Nothing in this section is intended to restrict the Respondent from making full answer and defence to any civil or other proceedings against the Respondent.
  5. If, for any reason, this Settlement Agreement is not accepted by the Hearing Panel, each of Staff and the Respondent will be entitled to any available proceedings, remedies and challenges, including proceeding to a disciplinary hearing pursuant to sections 20 and 24 of By-law No. 1, unaffected by the Settlement Agreement or the settlement negotiations.
  6. Staff and the Respondent agree that the terms of the Settlement Agreement, including the attached Schedule “A”, will be released to the public only if and when the Settlement Agreement is accepted by the Hearing Panel.
  7. The Settlement Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts which together shall constitute a binding agreement. A facsimile copy of any signature shall be effective as an original signature.

DATED this 13th day of October, 2017.

“Chi Hong Arthur Yip”    
Chi Hong Arthur Yip    
“MC”   MC
Witness – Signature   Witness – Print Name
“Shaun Devlin”    

Shaun Devlin
Staff of the MFDA
Per: Shaun Devlin
Senior Vice-President,
Member Regulation – Enforcement

   

Schedule “A”

Order
File No.

IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING
PURSUANT TO SECTION 24.4 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF
THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

Re: Chi Hong Arthur Yip

ORDER

WHEREAS on [date], the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (the “MFDA”) issued a Notice of Settlement Hearing pursuant to section 24.4 of By-law No. 1 in respect of Chi Hong Arthur (the “Respondent”);

AND WHEREAS the Respondent entered into a settlement agreement with Staff of the MFDA, dated [date] (the “Settlement Agreement”), in which the Respondent agreed to a proposed settlement of matters for which the Respondent could be disciplined pursuant to ss. 20 and 24.1 of By-law No. 1;

AND WHEREAS the Hearing Panel is of the opinion that:

  1. between April 2012 and September 2015, the Respondent signed the signature of 10 clients on 13 account forms, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1; and
  2. between April 2012 and September 2015, the Respondent obtained, possessed and, in some instances, used to process transactions, 4 pre-signed account forms, contrary to MFDA Rule 2.1.1;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Settlement Agreement is accepted, as a consequence of which:

  1. The Respondent shall pay a fine in the amount of $12,500 pursuant to s. 24.1.1(b) of MFDA By-law No.1;
  2. The Respondent shall pay costs in the amount of $2,500 pursuant to s. 24.2 of MFDA By-law No.1;
  3. The Respondent shall pay the Fine and Costs in certified funds as follows:
    1. $2,500 (Costs) payable upon entering into the Settlement Agreement;
    2. $2083.33 on the last business day of [month and year to be inserted];
    3. $2083.33 on the last business day of [month and year to be inserted];
    4. $2083.33 on the last business day of [month and year to be inserted];
    5. $2083.33 on the last business day of [month and year to be inserted];
    6. $2083.33 on the last business day of [month and year to be inserted]; and
    7. $2083.33 on the last business day of [month and year to be inserted];
  4. If the Respondent fails to make any of the payments described above in paragraph 3, any outstanding balance of the Fine and Costs shall become immediately due and payable to the MFDA and the Respondent shall be immediately suspended from conducting securities related business while in the employ of or associated with a Member of the MFDA until such time as the total amount outstanding of Fine and Costs owed by the Respondent is paid to the MFDA, pursuant to s. 24.3.13(c) of MFDA By-law No.1;
  5. The Respondent shall in the future comply with MFDA Rule 2.1.1; and
  6. If at any time a non-party to this proceeding, with the exception of the bodies set out in section 23 of MFDA By-law No. 1, requests production of or access to exhibits in this proceeding that contain personal information as defined by the MFDA Privacy Policy, then the MFDA Corporate Secretary shall not provide copies of or access to the requested exhibits to the non-party without first redacting from them any and all personal information, pursuant to Rules 1.8(2) and (5) of the MFDA Rules of Procedure.

DATED this [day] day of [month], 20[  ].

Per:      __________________________
[Name of Public Representative], Chair

Per:      _________________________
[Name of Industry Representative]

Per:      _________________________
[Name of Industry Representative]